Oklahoma 8-man Football
« Post Message »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 25, 2013, 9:04am




Oklahoma 8-man Football :: OEMFCA :: General Info :: Post Message
Post Reply
Name:
Subject:
Terms of Service: I agree to the ProBoards Terms of Service
Security Check:
Message Icon: icon
Add Tags:
Add Smilies:
Message:
Expand
Characters Remaining:
Disable Smilies: If this box is checked, smiley emoticons will be disabled in your message.
shortcuts: hit alt+s to send, alt+p to preview, alt+c to spell check, or alt+r to reset


Topic Summary
Posted by statechampqb on Feb 3, 2012, 12:08pm
Need the HC at each school to respond....What would you like to see...
Option A....76 schools....40/36 just like it is.

Option B....80 schools ....40/40.Four 10 team Districts.

Option C....96 schools....Three 32 team classes.Four 8 team Districts.

Option D....96 schools...48/48.....Eight 6 team Districts...top 4 go.5 rounds of playoffs in B and C.
Posted by statechampqb on Feb 3, 2012, 1:43pm
PM me if you don't want to post.
Posted by gata on Feb 3, 2012, 2:13pm
B , C OR D WOULD BEAT WHAT WE HAVE NOW...I HAVE WEEK 2 AND 4 OPEN AND CANT GET A GAME...IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE I LIKE OPTION C BEST, THEN D THEN B...OPTION A NO LONGER WORKS AND IS OUTDATED...THERE IS STRENGTH IN NUMBERS TOO...
Posted by davidzachary on Feb 3, 2012, 3:18pm
Coach Harrell, I posted on another thread- someone from Ad, Committee contacted me this morning- asked to have meeting @ 8-Man Power lifting meet to get a feeling how we should go. Good idea- I'll try to be there.
DCLA would like 32-32-32 plan- help protect smaller schools and let the big boys get after it! David Zachary
Posted by coachrobc on Feb 5, 2012, 11:41pm
I would have to go with D. I LOVE THE idea of C BUT, I'm seeing a lot of travel time which pretty sure that was the main goal of expansion was to take care of.
Posted by coachloggins on Apr 16, 2012, 10:50am
Option C or D
Posted by bigmac on Apr 16, 2012, 11:07am
id like to see option D! stretch it out and do like the 3A,2A, and A!
Posted by mharris28 on Apr 16, 2012, 12:12pm
I like options C or D.
Posted by statechampqb on Apr 16, 2012, 3:14pm
Option C is what the Redistricting committee chose today at our meeting......gonna use the next few months to get all the ducks in order then present it at the end of the summer.Remember this isn't set in stone..just a proposal that is still months away from being done.We are trying our best to make things the BEST for every Class....trying to eliminate uneven Districts and Bye weeks the best we can....although all that can't be eliminated in every class...some will still have to deal with it.Guys you aren't gonna hurt my feelings at all...if you have an idea or concern...get in touch with me and I will listen....and I will try to inform you on why we are proposing certain things....It may not be just all about us...we are able to help those numbers in 11 Man by expanding 8 Man.
Posted by podunk33 on Apr 18, 2012, 10:13am
32 in 5A and 4A,64 in 3A,2A,72 in A.40 in B and 40 in C.Too many classes in my opinion.NO 6A.
Posted by statechampqb on Apr 18, 2012, 12:49pm
Po..............I don't think going back to 1991 is the answer.

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile